Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:52

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
'Strawberry Moon' 2025: June's full moon is about to break an annual record - Live Science
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
At Chicago baseball stadium, Pope Leo makes his first pitch to America - The Washington Post
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Does meth make women super horny like it does men?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What is your wildest experience in Bangalore that you haven’t told anyone?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Vera Rubin quarter coin released by US Mint - BBC Sky at Night Magazine
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
23andMe Sets New Auction With $305 Million New Bid From Ex-CEO - Bloomberg